Financial Incentives Boost Burgeoning Solar Installation Business
Mar 08, 2010 — San Diego Business Journal
By Marty Graham
As one of the nation's top solar generating cities, S... [ More ]
Toxic Triangle Hearings Call for End to Environmental Problems Harming Low-Income Communities and People of Color
Feb 18, 2010 — Oakland Local
While global warming has propelled environmental issues into the mainstream of ... [ More ]
Cedillo and Latino Legislative Caucus Host "El Poder Verde" Green Jobs Summit
Nov 05, 2009 — By: www.californiachronicle.com
LOS ANGELES - State Senator Gilbert Cedillo (D-Los Angel... [ More ]
A.B. 32
|
Background on A.B. 32, Global Warming Solutions Act |
|
On September 27, 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger signed A.B. 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act. The Act caps California’s greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) at 1990 levels by 2020. This legislation represents the first enforceable state-wide program in the U.S. to cap all GHG emissions from major industries that includes penalties for non-compliance. It requires the State Air Resources Board to establish a program for statewide greenhouse gas emissions reporting and to monitor and enforce compliance with this program. The Act also authorizes the state board to adopt market-based compliance mechanisms including cap-and-trade, and allows a one-year extension of the targets under extraordinary circumstances. Unlike traditional environmental legislation that often times ignores issues that affect the poor and working poor, A.B. 32 has language and provisions that provide leverage to ensure that poor people’s needs are considered. In particular, A.B. 32 creates a long-term process of community engagement to ensure that all voices that want to be considered are allowed an equal opportunity to be at the table. A.B. 32 also has a Community Empowerment Amendment that, “requires ARB to ensure that the GHG emission reduction rules, regulations, programs, mechanisms, and incentives under its jurisdiction direct public and private investment toward the most disadvantaged communities in California and provide an opportunity for small businesses, schools, affordable housing associations, and other community institutions to participate in and benefit from statewide efforts to reduce GHG emissions.” |
|
Why Greenlining's Voice is Necessary |
|
The provisions in A.B. 32 to protect and advance the interests of the poor will not work unless there is a coordinated and smart advocacy effort on behalf of the poor. The major stakeholders currently working on the implementation of A.B. 32 are traditional environmentalists, big business, and the environmental justice lobby. An opportunity is available for an advocate to develop a plan that encompasses issues related to economic opportunities and investments within the “green economy.” A.B. 32 might have regressive affects on the poor, especially during difficult economic times without Greenlining's voice. For more information on this project please contact Orson Aguilar at 510.926.4005. |






